Legal Opinion

Calloway v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 23, 1971No. 7128SC171Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

When this case was called for argument in this Court, the defendant Matthews moved that its appeal be treated as a petition for certiorari to review the order of Judge Ervin. The petition for certiorari as a substitute for an appeal is allowed.

The question presented is whether Judge Ervin on 12 November 1970 was precluded as a matter of law from allowing the motion of the defendant Matthews to amend its answer by pleading the statute of limitations. The answer lies in a consideration of Judge Hasty’s denial of the same motion on 4 May 1970.

The complaint in this action was filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Michigan National Bank v. HannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Hardy v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Balk v. Harris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API