Legal Opinion

Tedlie v. Dill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1847No. 16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. From Baker Superior Court. Tried before Judge Warren, in December, 1846. For the facts of the case, and the error assigned, soc the decision of the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Lumpkin, J,

delivering the opinion.

This was an action of Assumpsit, brought in Baker Superior Court, upon a joint and several promissory note, made by Edward H. William P. and Jessie B. Tedlie, and payable to James S. Avery or bearer. All three of the makers were included, and two of them only served with process, a return of non est inventus being made by the Sheriff as to the other. The cause came on for trial in December, 1846, when the defendants who were served, insisted that the plaintiff could not proceed against two of the joint contractors without the other being made a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Winkles v. Guenther & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Thompson v. GowenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API