Legal Opinion

Carthage Turnpike Co. v. Overman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1897No. 2,173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

— Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. At the first trial of the cause the jury disagreed and was discharged without having reached a verdict. At the second trial the jury returned a special verdict under the act of March 11, 1895, and the court sustained appellee’s motion for a venire de novo because of ambiguity and uncertainty in the special verdict, to which appellant excepted. The third trial resulted in a special verdict in appellee’s favor upon which the court rendered judgment over appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Numerous alleged errors have been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gann v. WormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Nagle v. HornbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Leppar v. EndertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Taylor v. LehmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Balph v. MagawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Rau v. Ball Bros. Glass Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API