Carthage Turnpike Co. v. Overman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
— Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. At the first trial of the cause the jury disagreed and was discharged without having reached a verdict. At the second trial the jury returned a special verdict under the act of March 11, 1895, and the court sustained appellee’s motion for a venire de novo because of ambiguity and uncertainty in the special verdict, to which appellant excepted. The third trial resulted in a special verdict in appellee’s favor upon which the court rendered judgment over appellant’s motion for a new trial.
Numerous alleged errors have been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Gann v. WormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Nagle v. HornbergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Leppar v. EndertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Taylor v. LehmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Balph v. MagawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Rau v. Ball Bros. Glass Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898