Legal Opinion

Getsie v. Borough of Braddock

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1989No. 1362 C.D. 1988, 1363, 1446 and 1447 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants, Borough of Braddock (Borough) and Hartford Life Insurance Company (Hartford), appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which found Hartford liable to Appellees, Joseph Fisher (Fisher), Joseph Franco (Franco), Peter Zablocki (Zablocki), Irene Drusky (Drusky), and Francis Muracca (Muracca) and the Borough liable to Muracca only for benefits due from a failed employee pension plan. The trial court’s decision is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

The issues presented on appeal are whether the trial court erred in finding Hartford liable to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tallarico EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Central Storage & Transfer Co. v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McKenna v. State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Berliner v. Bee Em Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Borough of Monaca v. KalervoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacHipongo Land & Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Plum Borough School District v. SchlegelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Czikowsky v. the Lebanon Zoning Brd. of Appeals, No. 112887 (Jul. 22, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API