Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Terwilliger v. Terwilliger

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2002No. 1999-SC-1064-DGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKeller, Justice

I would reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the entire judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court. Thus, while I concur in the part of the majority opinion which holds that the trial court properly set aside the property settlement agreement and reconsidered property division issues in light of evidence of Appellee’s overreaching, I dissent from the part of the majority opinion that remands the case to the trial court for it to “reconsider” the $200,000.00 it awarded to Appel-lee as separate, nonmarital property.

The majority simply ignores its role as a reviewing Court1 —…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brunson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  2. Hale v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Fitch v. BurnsKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Largent v. LargentKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Browning v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API