Legal Opinion

Nickla v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 14, 1976No. 62128PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE LORENZ

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff brought an action for declaratory judgment against defendant, his insurer, challenging the validity of the arbitration clause in his insurance policy. His motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied and judgment for defendant was granted. He appeals, contending that: (1) the arbitration clause in his insurance policy violates sections 143a and 442 of the Illinois Insurance Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 73, par. 755a and 1054); and (2) since the arbitration clause in his insurance policy is invalid, he may bring a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Morelock v. Millers' Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kenworthy v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kincl v. Hycel, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Lihosit v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Austin v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Lihosit v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API