Legal Opinion

Krempel v. Noltze

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1969No. 114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first issue presented on this appeal is whether defendant insurance company can defeat coverage by asserting the following provision in its insurance contract:

“This policy does not apply: under any of the coverages,
“a. to any automobile
“ (3) while used in a prearranged racing or speed contest; . . .”

For purposes of this appeal it is undisputed that defendant and plaintiff, as a guest in defendant’s automobile, were engaged in a prearranged racing contest on a public highway as distinguished from a drag strip or other private racecourse.

To determine whether the quoted exclusion is lawful,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Davison v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Nixon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wis. v. TournorNebraska Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API