Krempel v. Noltze
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The first issue presented on this appeal is whether defendant insurance company can defeat coverage by asserting the following provision in its insurance contract:
“This policy does not apply: under any of the coverages,
“a. to any automobile
“ (3) while used in a prearranged racing or speed contest; . . .”
For purposes of this appeal it is undisputed that defendant and plaintiff, as a guest in defendant’s automobile, were engaged in a prearranged racing contest on a public highway as distinguished from a drag strip or other private racecourse.
To determine whether the quoted exclusion is lawful,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Inspection Bureau v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Davison v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Nixon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- American Standard Insurance Co. of Wis. v. TournorNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.