Legal Opinion
Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Galveston-Houston
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 22, 2005No. CIV.A.H-05-1047PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs John Doe I, John Doe II, and John Doe III sued Juan Carlos Patino- Arango; the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, Archbishop Joseph A. Fiorenza, Monsignor William Pickard (collectively, “Archdiocese Defendants”); and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI (referred to as “Cardinal Ratzinger” or “Pope Benedict” as appropriate), for numerous claims arising out of Patino’s alleged sexual abuse of the plaintiffs in 1996. (Docket Entry Nos. 1, 29). Plaintiffs assert causes of action for breach of confidential relationships…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. KhobragadeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- European Community v. RJR NABISCO, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Sikhs for Justice v. SinghDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Free and Sovereign State of Chihuahua v. Duarte-JaquezDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020