Legal Opinion
BEER v. ADVANCED AUTO PARTS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 15, 2020No. 5:19-cv-05939Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARK BEER, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, NO. 5:19-cv-05939-KSM v. ADVANCED AUTO PARTS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. July 15, 2020 Plaintiff Mark Beer brings two counts against Defendant Advanced Auto Parts. Count I of Beer’s Complaint alleges that Advanced Auto Parts violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by discriminating against Beer due to his disability and failing to engage in the required interactive process. (Doc. No. 1.) Count II alleges that Advanced Auto Parts retaliated against Beer in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Dennis Robinson v. John H. Dalton, Secretary to United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.