Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 2001No. WD 58585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

Odessa Brown contends that the circuit court erred in denying her Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief because she established that her attorney was ineffective in representing her and that this prejudiced her case. We dismiss Brown’s appeal because she did not file her Rule 29.15 motion with the circuit court before the rule’s deadline.

This court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in State v. Brown, 958 S.W.2d 574 (Mo.App.1997), and we issued a mandate on February 18, 1998. Rule 29.15(b) says that, if an appeal of the judgment sought to be vacated and set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. State v. IsaiahMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matchett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Hines v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API