Legal Opinion

Claim of Wiess v. Mittal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarry, J.

Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 31, 2010, which directed Bethlehem Steel Corporation to produce certain evidence, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed November 16, 2011, which, among other things, ruled that claimant’s workers’ compensation award was to be apportioned between Arcelor Mittal and Bethlehem Steel Corporation in accordance with claimant’s length of service with each employer.

Claimant was employed as a steel worker from 1965 until 2008. His initial employer, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, went bankrupt in 2003; thereafter, its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Claim of Hammes v. Sunrise Psychiatric Clinic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Claim of Curtis v. XeroxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Claim of Richman v. NYS Unified Court SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Claim of Pache v. Aviation Volunteer Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Claim of Stratta v. North American Cement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API