Legal Opinion
Harris v. Borne
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 2, 1995No. 01-95-0354-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that the appellant did not timely perfect her appeal. They contend that the appellant did not file a motion for extension to file the affidavit of inability to pay costs with this Court.
For this Court to grant an extension to perfect an appeal, the appellant must file the instrument required to perfect appeal and the motion for extension of time no later than 15 days after the last date for filing the instrument. Ludwig v. Enserch Corp., 845 S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ); Tex.R.App.P. 41(a)(2).
This…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Christy Jean Wand LaCokeTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Mr. Penguin Tuxedo Rental & Sales, Inc. v. NCR Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ludwig v. Enserch Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Gonzalez v. VaelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.