Legal Opinion · Dissent

Valero Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1996No. 95-60102Published

1DissentJerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge

Valero Energy Corporation (“Valero”) realized every taxpayer’s dream — it took an improper deduction, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the “Commissioner”) decided not to challenge it. Rather than acknowledge that she has forfeited her right both to challenge the 1979 deduction and to invoke the “duty of consistency,”1 the Commissioner wants to exact a pound of flesh by challenging the 1984 deduction. I am puzzled by the Commissioner’s position, because in arguing that the 1979 deduction was proper, she undermines her position in countless cases for the sake of a victory in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API