Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Dailey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1936No. 2915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Chief Justice.

Fundamental error appears on the face of the record in this case, which originated in the county court of Houston county. The action was by defendants in error against plaintiff in error and her husband upon' a promissory note in the sum of $472.46, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien on. a Chevrolet truck and a Chevrolet coach, with no allegation as to the value of the mortgaged property. On trial to the court without a jury, judgment was rendered to the effect that defendants in error recover against plaintiff in error all the relief prayed for, and that they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campsey v. BrumleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Tant v. Baldwin Piano Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Vda Olloqui v. DuranTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Booher v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Whittle Music Co. v. LammonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bishop & Babcock Sales Co. v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Berger v. TiemannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Graddy v. Le BusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API