Legal Opinion

Rauch v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Kathleen Rauch petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that reversed an order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that had denied the petition of Kids Wear Services, Inc. (Employer) for Rauch to submit to an expert interview pursuant to Section 314(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 651(a). The question that Rauch presents in this appeal is whether the Board incorrectly held that amendments by the Act of June 24, 1996, P.L. 350 (Act 57), to Section 306(b)(2)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Keystone Coal Mining Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Fidler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Miegoc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Smiley v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API