Legal Opinion

Lamolinara v. Lamolinara

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 2012No. 1D11-4396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Former Wife appeals the trial court’s order denying her Motion for Relief from Judgment, alleging that Former Husband’s 2005 financial affidavits were fraudulent. We affirm, as we find the appeal without merit, but not frivolous. We write only to address Former Wife’s motion for attorney’s fees filed under section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and rule 9.400, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, because we find that Former Wife’s attorney’s fee motion must be remanded to the trial court. We reject Former Husband’s motion for attorney’s fees, as it is not supported by applicable law.

Section…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Dresser v. DresserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Rados v. RadosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arthur Collin Cherry v. Katherine Hiett VikerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Christina Fano Schultheis v. Milan SchultheisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Christina Fano Schultheis v. Milan SchultheisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API