Legal Opinion

Ex Parte St. John

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 2001No. 1992005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael E. St. John, an inmate at the Limestone Correctional Facility, Capshaw, Alabama, petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge and the Court of Criminal Appeals to grant the petitioner's motions to proceed in forma pauperis in the trial court on a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition and on appeal of the trial judge's denial of that Rule 32 petition. We grant a writ for only partial relief, as the principal aspects of the petitioner's claims for relief are moot.

On July 26, 1999, the petitioner filed a Rule 32 petition challenging his 1984 conviction for breaking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Anderson ex rel. Anderson v. Talladega Little League, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Alabama v. NeelSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API