Legal Opinion
People v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Tom, J.P.
This appeal arises from the perjury convictions of an interrelated group of persons who, while under oath before the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), falsely denied that one of the defendants, Stanley Cohen, supervised a retail sales operation of a stock brokerage firm, Renaissance Securities Financial Corporation (Renaissance), despite a 1973 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) order barring him for life from associating with any broker-dealer in a proprietary or supervisory capacity.
The distant roots of this case date to the early 1970s,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Julie Tang and Hua Yu ChenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- In Re LoneySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. KozlowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Scher v. National Ass'n of Securities DealersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Scher v. NATIONAL ASS'N OF SECURITIES DEALERSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005