Legal Opinion

Segear v. Segear

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Holt county. Tried below before Tiffany, J. 6 Waite’s Practice, 139. U. S. v. Hudson, 7 Crancb, 32. Yates v. People, 6 Johns., 337. Neiohouse v. Newhouse, 12 Pac. Eep., 422. Const., Sec. 20, Art. I. State v. Jaynes, 19 Neb., 697.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

This action was brought by the wife against the husband, before the district court of Holt county, under the provisions of Chap. 25, Comp. Statutes, for divorce and alimony, on the grounds of extreme cruelty and gross neglect of support.

The petition claimed alimony out of the husband’s own.ership of neat cattle valued at $185, and of his pre-emption and timber culture rights, under laws of the United States, in two separate quarter sections of public land, under improvement, valued at $800, his title to which were inchoate, and in elements merely.

*307The defendant appeared and answered, denying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Callahan v. CallahanNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cain v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Going v. GoingTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In re PhillipsNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Clark v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Nygren v. NygrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API