Legal Opinion

In re Interest of C.Y.K.S.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2018No. 17-0214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Texas Family Code section 231.211(a) prohibits courts from assessing costs at the conclusion of a Title IV-D case against a party who was provided services by the Title IV-D agency. In this case, we are asked whether this prohibition applies to courts of appeals. We hold that it does.

Shana Williams, mother of C.Y.K.S., filed a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, which resulted in a determination that Christopher Spates was the child's father and an order that he pay child support. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) filed a motion to enforce the child support order on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Garcia v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CC Frost Properties, Ltd. v. Brett Birkeland and MSCI 2007-IQ16 North Carancahua Street, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
  2. CC Frost Properties, Ltd. v. Brett Birkeland and MSCI 2007-IQ16 North Carancahua Street, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
  3. Trinity Healthcare, LLC v. Lilian Peacock, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Gladys Cecilia Keels, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
  4. in Re Abelardo and Elida Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2020
  5. in the Interest of Z.O.M. and K.R.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API