In re Interest of C.Y.K.S.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Texas Family Code section 231.211(a) prohibits courts from assessing costs at the conclusion of a Title IV-D case against a party who was provided services by the Title IV-D agency. In this case, we are asked whether this prohibition applies to courts of appeals. We hold that it does.
Shana Williams, mother of C.Y.K.S., filed a suit affecting the parent-child relationship, which resulted in a determination that Christopher Spates was the child's father and an order that he pay child support. The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) filed a motion to enforce the child support order on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Molinet v. KimbrellTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. DuenezTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Gary Wayne Jaster v. Comet II Construction, Inc., Joe H. Schneider, Laura H. Schneider, and Austin Design GroupTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Garcia v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CC Frost Properties, Ltd. v. Brett Birkeland and MSCI 2007-IQ16 North Carancahua Street, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
- CC Frost Properties, Ltd. v. Brett Birkeland and MSCI 2007-IQ16 North Carancahua Street, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
- Trinity Healthcare, LLC v. Lilian Peacock, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Gladys Cecilia Keels, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
- in Re Abelardo and Elida Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2020
- in the Interest of Z.O.M. and K.R.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020