Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 23, 1892No. 16875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the ease: This ease was referred, to the court by the Secretary of the Treasury by communication in th¿ words following: “Washington, January 23,1891. “I have the honor to inclosehere with a claim, with attendant papers, made by Charles A. Hitchcock and George Van Zandt, the latter for the use of the Prairie State National Bank of Chicago against the United States.

Read the full summary

The Reporters’ statement of the ease: This ease was referred, to the court by the Secretary of the Treasury by communication in th¿ words following: “Washington, January 23,1891. “I have the honor to inclosehere with a claim, with attendant papers, made by Charles A. Hitchcock and George Van Zandt, the latter for the use of the Prairie State National Bank of Chicago against the United States. “The demand is for the payment of the last installment due Sundberg & Co. for the construction of the custom-house at Galveston, Tex., completed in October, 1890. The contract price was $118,566, and the…

1Opinion of the Court

Richakdson, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The actual claimants in this case are the Prairie State National Bank and Charles A. Hitchcock, who each seek to recover the amount admitted by the defendants to be due to one or the other.

Sundberg & Co. entered into a written contract with the defendants’ officers to build a custom-house at Galveston, Tex., and gave bond for its faithful performance with Charles A. Hitchcock and others as sureties.

They entered upon the work, and from time to time borrowed money from the Prairie State National Bank upon their own promissory notes. On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Spofford v. KirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. McKnight v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Shwarz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1900
  3. United States v. Shannon (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. Shannon (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API