Legal Opinion
Dibbern v. City of Bakersfield
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 13, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00723Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY DIBBERN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00723-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION v. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 50 14 15 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., ( Doc. 135) 16 Defendants. 21-Day Deadline 17 18 19 Introduction 20 Trial of this action commenced on September 16, 2024. (Doc. 115). On September 25, 2024, 21 the jury returned a note indicating they were “hopelessly deadlocked.” (Doc. 132). Following a 22 conference with the parties outside the presence of the jury, the Court…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.