Legal Opinion
Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 21, 1924No. 24,143Published
1Per curiam
Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.
The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.
Order affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boushor v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924