Legal Opinion

Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1924No. 24,143Published

1Per curiam

Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.

The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.

Order affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boushor v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924