Legal Opinion
Anderberg v. Martin
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 30, 1987No. CIV-87-1939-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RALPH G. THOMPSON, Chief Judge.
Petitioner brings this action, pro se and in forma pauperis, for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges that his due process and equal protection rights have been violated by respondents who have deprived him of his liberty by refusing to give him credit for a brief period during which he was incarcerated in a community treatment center.
The Court has determined that an eviden-tiary hearing is not necessary in this matter, inasmuch as it can be resolved on the basis of the record. See Edgemon v. Lockhart, 768 F.2d 252 (8th Cir.1985);…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- William Lloyd Hill v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Joseph Harold Johnson v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Charles Curtis Harris v. Irl Day, Warden United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Lloyd Eugene Brofford v. Ronald C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Ruben Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Raymond WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989