Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curren v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1974No. Nos. 48559-48561Published

1DissentOnion, Presiding Judge

This court has over a period of years held that the provisions of Article 26.13, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., are mandatory and the prerequisites therein must be complied with as a condition precedent to the validity of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere in a felony case and the question of compliance may be raised at any time. May v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 534, 209 S.W.2d 606 (1948); Alexander v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 53, 288 S.W.2d 779 (1956); Ex parte Marshall, 479 S.W.2d 921 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); and Wilson v. State, 456 S.W.2d 941, 943 (Tex.Cr.App.1970) (concurring opinion), and cases there cited.

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Bosworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Ex Parte MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API