Legal Opinion

Ruwitch v. FIRST NATL. BANK OF MIAMI

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1976No. 75-593PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

327 So.2d 833 (1976)

Lee RUWITCH and James Seller, Appellants,

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, Appellee.

No. 75-593.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 24, 1976.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, for appellants.

Steel, Hector & Davis and Barry R. Davidson, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

2Per curiam

Appellants, Lee Ruwitch and James Seiler, seek reversal of a final judgment awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $15,000 to the appellee, First National Bank of Miami.

This is the second appearance before the court. See…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baruch v. GiblenSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Dade County v. Oolite Rock CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Ruwitch v. FIRST NATL. BANK OF MIAMIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. VarelaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. All-Star Ins. Corp. v. Scandia, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Baldwin Piano and Organ Co. v. DoteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. QuintanaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Sproul v. Estate of HarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API