Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Peterson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 16, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*941OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order and final judgment dated July 7, 1997 reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment granted in favor of tenants dismissing the holdover petition.
In accordance with a prior stipulation of settlement, tenants entered into the subject apartment premises in August 1993 under a written lease which, by its terms, was “deemed automatically renewed for subsequent two-year terms”. The lease did not contain a provision “giving the landlord the right to terminate the time fixed for occupancy * * * if he deem the tenant objectionable” (RPAPL 711 [1]). Nonetheless, landlord…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- MSG Pomp Corp. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Perrotta v. Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Willace Realty Management, Inc. v. HensonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1971
4Cited by4 opinions
- United Mutual Houses, L.P. v. AndujarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- 1646 Union, LLC v. SimpsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
- BMG Enterprises, Inc. v. BagdonAuburn City Court · 2007
- Rahman v. Lewis, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County2024