Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Dixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1911PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by Roberta C. Dixon from F.erguson, J., at May Term, 1911, of Gbeene. The facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr.' Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe clerk of the Superior Court, after citation to J. W. Dixon, guardian of Eoberta Dixon, and upon Ms answer filed, removed him from his guardianship upon the ground that he had failed to file his account as guardian, and, further, because said guardian claimed an interest in the property adverse to his ward. On appeal to the judge this order was reversed, and the ward, Eoberta 0. Dixon, appealed to this Court, prosecuting said appeal through her guardian ad litem, appointed by the court by consent.. It is found by the judge upon facts admitted, that Eobert A. L. Carr executed a deed to his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Blackwell v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Featherston v. . MerrimonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Wall v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Nixon v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. . WhichardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Beacom v. AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Jefferson v. . JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API