Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ezell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 9, 1979No. Nos. 31,304, 32,414, 33,326, 33,679; CM 432699, SPCM 11087, NCM 76-0838, ACM 22036Published

1ConcurrenceFletcher, Chief Judge

I

I concur. Judge Perry’s opinion constitutes a well-reasoned and articulate enunciation of the civilian law of search and seizure as interpreted at the present time and as generally applied in courts-martial. Yet, the implication of that opinion, namely, that a servicemember is entitled under the Fourth Amendment to a probable cause determination by a “neutral and detached magistrate” as in the civilian community, becomes increasingly suspect to me. As indicated in my recent opinions in United States v. Harris, 5 M.J. 44 (C.M.A.1978); United States v. Rivera, 4 M.J. 215 (C.M.A. 1978); United…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API