Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Farrington Manufacturing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Waulmha County. The case sufficiently appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed September 20, 1887:

By the Court.

One of the two sureties in the undertaking on the appeal herein is neither a householder nor freeholder within this state. Por this reason the respondent moved to dismiss the appeal. The undertaking was given pursuant to B. S. sec. 3065, and the fact above stated was disclosed by the attempted justification of the sureties after due exception had been taken by the respondent to their sufficiency. Sec. 3065 provides that, in such cases, *214sureties shall justify in the manner prescribed in secs. 2704-2706, which relate to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Burger v. SinclairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Johnston v. Northwestern Live Stock InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Ady v. BarnettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API