Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Larsen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The motions for dismissal of the cause of action for breach of the covenant against encumbrances were properly denied in view of the undisputed proof of actual encroachments tending to establish that cause of action. Consequently the exceptions of the defendants to the denial of these motions are not sufficient to raise the question whether breach of such a covenant can be predicated on the necessity for repairs or alterations to conform a structure to building laws, and we express no opinion thereon.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaloumenos v. BottaccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API