Legal Opinion
Gray v. Jaeger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*304On a prior appeal (17 AD3d 286 [2005]), this Court struck defendants’ answer. As a result, they are now foreclosed from pursuing discovery in preparation for the inquest (see Hall v Penas, 5 AD3d 549 [2004]), including a physical examination of plaintiff. Concur—Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hall v. PenasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by6 opinions
- Servais v. Silk Nail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- 1591 Second Ave. LLC v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- 1591 Second Ave. LLC v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.