Legal Opinion

Gray v. Jaeger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*304On a prior appeal (17 AD3d 286 [2005]), this Court struck defendants’ answer. As a result, they are now foreclosed from pursuing discovery in preparation for the inquest (see Hall v Penas, 5 AD3d 549 [2004]), including a physical examination of plaintiff. Concur—Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. PenasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Servais v. Silk Nail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. 1591 Second Ave. LLC v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. 1591 Second Ave. LLC v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Beaulieu v. Jay Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API