Legal Opinion

Great Southern Bank v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 4, 2008No. SC 88943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Great Southern Bank seeks review of an Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) decision determining that an aircraft sale and purchase did not meet the requirements for the “taken in trade” exemption from use taxes under section 144.025, RSMo 2000. 1 The AHC decision is affirmed.

I. Jurisdiction and Standard of Review

This Court has jurisdiction to review the AHC’s decision pursuant to Mo. Const, article V, section 3 because the case involves construction of state revenue laws. The AHC’s interpretation of revenue laws is reviewed de novo. DST Sys., Inc. v. Dir. of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook Tractor Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. DST Systems, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  3. Branson Properties USA, L.P. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Scotchman's Coin Shop, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Hutton v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harness v. Southern Copyroll, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Loren Cook Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. In Re: Area 16 Public Defender Office III Ruth Petsch v. Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney's OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. The Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., and Jackson County Sports Complex, Intervenor-Appellant v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API