King v. Fritz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
This action would be no excuse for an addition to the great bulk of legal printed matter were it not for the fact that it is a substitute for formal findings and incidentally illustrates an exception to the classic example of a supposedly impregnable case. The plaintiff, a personable, talented and charming young lady, was injured in a collision between two automobiles, in one of which she was a passenger. There is no suggestion that she was in any way negligent; in fact she was asleep at the time, a fact which possibly may have had an effect of more consequence to her than precluding her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stern v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Doulin v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Sporborg v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Messinger v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1944
- Koehler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. FritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956