Legal Opinion

Zarnstorff v. Neenah Creek Custom Trucking

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 14, 2010No. 2009AP1321PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VERGERONT, EJ.

¶ 1. The primary issue on this appeal is whether the auto exclusion in the commercial general liability (CGL) policy issued by Acuity, a mutual insurance company, to Neenah Creek Custom Trucking applies to exclude coverage for injuries sustained by Faul and Nadine Zarnstorff. They were injured in an accident that occurred when a Neenah Trucking employee ran across the highway after checking to see whether a tractor and the trailer it pulled (semi) could fit under the underpass. The semi was being operated by another employee. The circuit court concluded the exclusion applies.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Johnson v. Allis Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siebert v. Wisconsin American Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Eliason, Edward v. Superior Refining Company, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  3. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API