Legal Opinion

Temex Energy, Inc. v. Hastie (In Re Amarex, Inc.)

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. BK-82-02335(A), No. CIV-87-382-APublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal of the bankruptcy court's order of September 26, 1986 dismissing a Complaint to Avoid Preferential Transfer. The appellant, Temex Energy, Inc. argues that the bankruptcy court erred in its interpretation of the subject plan of reorganization and in its application of certain provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The appellee, Hastie and Kirschner (H-K) has responded, and the issues presented are ready for determination.

Factual Background

The record indicates that an involuntary Chapter 7 Petition was filed as to the debt- or, Amarex, Inc., on December…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Fortec Constructors v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
In Re Stratford Of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1767, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8534 Freddie Eaton v. Courtaulds of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
Tennessee Wheel & Rubber Co. v. Captron Corporate Air Fleet (In Re Tennessee Wheel & Rubber Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

Harstad v. First American Bank (In Re Harstad)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
Bonwit Teller, Inc. v. Jewelmasters, Inc. (In Re Hooker Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
In Re Crowthers McCall Pattern, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
Zahn v. Yucaipa Capital FundDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1998
Pate v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.