Legal Opinion

Crosley Radio Corp. v. Dart

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1947No. 10265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The problem presented for solution by the appeal involves the interpretation of a written contract entered into by the parties to the present controversy, for the assignment of a patent application including the granting of an option to the purchaser for an exclusive license under other patents to be carved out of the parent application and to be made the subject of divisional applications. While no question of validity or infringement is here presented, decision nevertheless requires claim analysis and interpretation.

The inventor was the appellee, Dart. He had conceived…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kodel Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Warren Telechron Clock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. Hazeltine Research Corp. v. Freed-Eisemann Radio Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cordovan Associates, Incorporated v. Dayton Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. KrasnovDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Rocform Corporation v. Acitelli-Standard Concrete Wall, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. United Artists Corp. v. Strand Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  5. Rocform Corporation v. Acitelli-Standard Concrete Wall, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API