Linehan v. Linehan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The petitioners having failed to enter their appeal in this court within thirty days after the entry of the decree in the Probate Court as required by R. L. c. 162, §§ 9, 10, are compelled to rely on § 13, which provides, that “If a person who is aggrieved omits, without default on his part, to claim or prosecute his appeal and it appears that justice requires a revision of the case, the supreme court of probate . . . may, upon his petition and upon terms, allow an appeal to be entered and prosecuted.” Bartlett v. Slater, 183 Mass. 152.
It was said in Capen v. Skinner, 139 Mass. 190, 191, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Boston v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- McKenna v. McArdleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Bartlett v. SlaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Capen v. SkinnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Daley v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paras v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Golden v. CrawshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pepper v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WithingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Hall v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.