Legal Opinion

Palmer Well Services Inc. v. MacK Trucks, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1989No. C-8356PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Conflict with Rule 292 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Section 62.102 of the Government Code, regarding the qualifications of jurors and the requisites of verdicts, prompts this court’s examination of this case.

Suit was filed to recover for personal injuries suffered by petitioner, Paul Quino- nez, as a result of an explosion and fire of a hot oil treatment unit and truck. Quino-nez was employed by petitioner Palmer Well Services, Inc. (Petitioners will be referred to collectively as “Palmer”). The trial was to jury which rendered a 10 — 2, take-nothing verdict against the plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. VaronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. De Leon v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston & Southeast Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  2. Berry Property Management, Inc. v. Bliskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Dunlap v. Excel Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
  5. Excel Corp. v. Apodaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API