Sigwald v. City Bank
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Prince, J., Anderson, September, 1905. Action by Lucy M. Sigwald ag'ainst the City Bank, its president, receiver and board of directors. Erom order requiring' plaintiff to amend her complaint, she appeals. cite: 44 S. C., 97; Morse on Bank, 97; Cook on Corp., sec. 648; Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 1095; 7 Rich. Eq., 230; 1 Abb. Pr., 39; 44 N. Y. App.
Read the full summary
Before Prince, J., Anderson, September, 1905. Action by Lucy M. Sigwald ag'ainst the City Bank, its president, receiver and board of directors. Erom order requiring' plaintiff to amend her complaint, she appeals. cite: 44 S. C., 97; Morse on Bank, 97; Cook on Corp., sec. 648; Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 1095; 7 Rich. Eq., 230; 1 Abb. Pr., 39; 44 N. Y. App. D., 333; 21 P. & P., 241. cite: Code, 181; 12 S. C., 1; Pomeroy, sec. 519; 93 U. S., 233; 92 U. S., 161; 20 Wall, .520'; 113 U. S'., 302; 85 Fed. R., 825; 25 S. C., 355; 39 S. C., 51; 44 S. C., 46, 64; 44 S. C., 460'; 67 S'. C., 83; Eney. P. & P.,…
1Opinion of the Court
Tihe opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice? Gary.
This is an appeal from an order requiring the plaintiff to make her complaint, definite and certain. That portion of the order which, is necessary to understand the questions involved is as. follow's: “I am1 clearly of the opinion that the complaint ‘is. so indefinite and uncertain’ that the precise nature of the charge is not apparent, and that the Court should require the pleadings to> be made more definite and certain by amendment. No> one should be brought into! Court without being fully advised concerning the charges made…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Collins v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Buist v. MelchersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Union Central L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919