Legal Opinion

Washington International Insurance v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 1, 1988No. Court No. 81-12-01678Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RE, Chief Judge:

Defendant moves before the chief judge to extend the time to respond to plaintiffs motion for reassignment. This motion raises a question of first impression in this court pertaining to the interrelationship of Rules 6(a) and 6(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of International Trade, which regulate the method of computing time for responding to pleadings and motions.

On January 13, 1988, plaintiff served defendant by mail with a copy of a nondispo-sitive motion before the chief judge to reassign this action from a three-judge panel to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nalty v. Nalty Tree FarmDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987
  2. Tushner v. United States District Court For The Central District Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API