Legal Opinion

Maclam v. Hallam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Case by' Robert A. Madam against Carrie Hallam, Laura Manthei, and Clara Mack for personal injuries. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

Plaintiff walking upon a sidewalk in the city of Marquette, stumbled or fell over a,crate or *687crates so placed in the street that the' end or ends projected over and upon the sidewalk. Claiming to have been injured, he brought his action for damages against the owners of the property fronting and abutting upon the street at the point where the obstruction was placed. Of the seven joint owners or co-owners of the property, three only were served with process, and only those who were served appeared. The cause coming on for trial, and, a jury having been impaneled, counsel for the plaintiff made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Fisher v. ThirkellMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Lynch v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sholberg v. TrumanMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Grooms v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. SampleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Peters v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Baucino v. FitzpatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API