Andrews v. Andrews
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion
A reargument of the point referred to in the ninth paragraph of the syllabus was granted and briefs have been submitted covering the point more fully than the original briefs.
In their original brief, counsel for respondent said that the right to interest from the date of James' death to the date of the verdict had been conceded. Counsel for appellants denied this, and the briefs on the reargument go into the matter at considerable length.
It now appears that, before the charge to the jury was delivered, a statement prepared by an accountant was presented to the court by respondent's counsel.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- County of Itasca v. RalphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Legal News Publishing Co. v. Iron Trail Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927