Legal Opinion

Jack Poust & Co. v. Gross

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1972No. 8618PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

*1069This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board1 dismissing an opposition to appellee’s application2 to register CHERRY JUBILEE, the word CHERRY being disclaimed, for wine. Appellant asserts that appellee’s mark so resembles CHERRY JULEP, nsed and registered3 by appellant prior to appellee’s asserted first use, and CHERRY JUBILEE, allegedly used by appellant’s predecessor since a date prior to appellant’s asserted date of first use, both used for wine, as to be likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake or to deceptively cause purchasers to believe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard International Corporation, Assignee, by Merger of the Bon Ami Company v. American Sponge and Chamois Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. In Re General Electric CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Dan River Mills, Incorporated v. The Yorke Shirt CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eaton Allen Corp. v. Paco Impressions Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API