People ex rel. Lownds v. New-York Common Pleas
New York Supreme Court
. Motion for a mandamus. The grounds for the applicaA ^ tion are fully stated in the opinion of the chief justice.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Savage, Ch. J.
This is a motion for a mandamus to the New-York common pleas, commanding them to vacate a rule setting aside the default of the plaintiff jn an action of replevin, for not answering the defendant’s avowry. One Bernard Bagley brought replevin against Oliver M. Lownds, the relator, for certain specified articles 0f property. To the plaintiff’s declaration, the defendant p¡ea¿ej5 \ jVbjj cepit; %. That the goods in question were property of Richard Pettit; and 3. Avowed the taking as sheriff of New-York, by virtue of executions against Pettit, and averred that the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Newell Universal Mill Co. v. . MuxlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Kilburn v. LoweNew York Supreme Court · 1885