Legal Opinion

Star City Sportswear, Inc. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance of America

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division majority that the contract’s warranty clause clearly requires that each escort contain a minimum of two guards. Plaintiffs proof was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it fulfilled that requirement (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563 [1980]). Defendant, on the other hand, offered sufficient proof establishing plaintiffs material breach of the warranty clause as a matter of law. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slattery Skanska Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Broad Street, LLC v. Gulf InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Anghel v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Triple Diamond Café, Inc. v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Diaz v. Lexington Exclusive Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API