Legal Opinion

Storlie v. Sachse

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1931No. 23219. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Storlie, commenced this action in the superior court for Pierce county seeking recovery from Arthur Weichbrod, as executor of the estate of Edmund H. Seidler, deceased. The executor having died while the action was pending, W.L. Sachse was duly appointed administrator of the estate with the will annexed, and as such duly substituted as the defendant. Thereafter, the cause proceeded to trial in the superior court, sitting without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment denying to Storlie recovery, from which he has appealed to this court.

The record brought here from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Drain v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Scammon v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Macdonald v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Plummer v. LightWashington Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hoffman v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API