Louisiana Chemical Ass'n v. State, Louisiana Department of Revenue
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, j.
|aThis is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. After a de novo review, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Louisiana Chemical Association, Alma Plantation, L.L.C., Louisiana Pigment Company, L.P., Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 Pipeline, L.L.C., and Phillips 66 Partners Holdings, L.L.C., (collectively the plaintiffs)1 filed a petition for declaratory judgment on July 1, 2015, naming as defendants the State of Louisiana, through the Louisiana Department of Revenue; Tim Barfield, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hondroulis v. SchuhmacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- McLane Southern, Inc. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- BP Oil Co. v. Plaquemines Parish Gov.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barber v. La. Workforce Comm'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Barber v. La. Workforce Comm'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Freeman Eric TuckerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Gregory P. DauzatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a and the Louisiana Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2023