Legal Opinion

Rosenbloom v. Hutchins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1944No. 27,985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

The appellant began this action by filing a complaint seeking to foreclose his lien upon a certain lot in the City of Gary, represented by a Barrett Law special assessment bond, and for a judgment against the county for.the amount of the bond and interest. The defendant, Bessie M. Hutchins, filed an answer and cross-complaint, alleging that she had purchased the property in question from the auditor of the county after the auditor had purchased the property for the benefit of the school fund upon a sale for the purpose of satisfying a delinquent school fund mortgage, which mortgage antedated…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town & Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. SavageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Mittie Burd, an Infant, Who Sues by Her Father and Next Friend, Harry Burd v. Dr. James Y. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Walter v. BaloghIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, FLCA v. TuckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Indiana State Personnel Board v. ParkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API