Legal Opinion

Bawcom v. Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1974No. 74-12PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK Holt, Justice.

By conditional sales contracts, the appellant purchased certain farm equipment from appellee. Thereafter, appellee commenced a replevin action against appellant to repossess the equipment alleging delinquent payments on the unpaid balance. After giving notice of a proposed public sale to the highest bidder, appellee amended its complaint seeking a money judgment. After the auction, appellee filed a “Report of Sale” and prayed for a deficiency judgment. Appellant rr\oved to strike the amended complaint and “Report of Sale” on the theory of election of remedies.

The lower…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Widmer v. Fort Smith Vehicle & MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. GilkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. River Valley Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Ross v. McDanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Danco Construction Co. v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Medical & Dental Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Lake Hamilton Camp & Conference GroundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Brown v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Gibson v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API